如果只是看到Amerigeddon的娱乐价值那就大大贬低了这部电影了

首先我们来看看这篇名为《美国迦顿制作人的警告》，我相信深度瓣友是有能力读懂这篇通俗易懂的文章的。

Norris, the eldest son of martial arts, film and television star and WND exclusive columnist Chuck Norris, told WND he hopes that it’s entertaining and that people come away with a message.

Things got just a little bit eerie while the film was being made, with many “bizarre coincidences,” he said.

For example, the film’s plot includes a nuclear attack, and now North Korea is threatening the U.S. The movie also touches on weapon confiscation, just as President Obama has been pressing for more gun control.

Then, one of the heroes is faced with the heavy hand of government while in real life the federal government’s massive Jade Helm military exercise in the Southwest has raised personal liberty concerns.

In the movie, an electromagnetic pulse attack over the U.S. wipes out the energy grid, along with all electronic devices, such as phones, credit card processing systems and computers.

The American government reacts to the attack, which was staged with the help of the U.N., by declaring martial law and stripping Americans of their constitutional rights and their guns.

“Our government, bought and paid for and ruled from the bench, is our bad guy,” Norris explained. “The heroes are a group of Americans who say, ‘We have a Constitution and a Bill of Rights and we will not be trampled on.'”

“Amerigeddon” touches on globalist issues such as the New World Order and the National Defense Authorization Act.

“We’ve just taken our story and stripped it down to real people, real issues, real things that are happening,” he said.

“It is a movie, it is fictional. But it is very much a newsreel,” he said. “If you were to just open a newspaper and look at what’s going on in the world, this is our movie.”

Norris said he has been making Christian films since he directed “Walker, Texas Ranger,” his father’s television hit, in the 1990s.

He said he hopes “Amerigeddon” makes people think about the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment, because there are real world implications.

For example, “If we get the wrong Supreme Court judge, it’s over,” he said.

“A Nation Forsaken” by Michael Maloof lays out the reality of an EMP attack, and it’s not pretty. Available at the WND Superstore.

The movie project began some 18 months ago when Heavin wrote the screenplay. Norris said he first doubted the story line, but as he began to see evidence of tyranny even in America, it suddenly seemed appropriate.

He said the film tries to convey that “we feel the government is overreaching its authority; Obama is ruling from the bench, our rights are being infringed on a daily basis.”

It also warns that a powerful EMP could bring America to its knees, destroying power, communications, the Internet, transportation, shipping and natural gas supplies.

Mike Norris, who lives in Dallas, got his inspiration to work in film on the set of his father’s movies.

“Amerigeddon” is only the first in a series of planned films and TV projects through which Norris and Heavin hope to promote patriotic values. Norris told WND the next film will portray what the world would look like a year after an EMP strike. They also hope to explore what would happen if the banks declared a holiday in America as they’ve done in Greece.

        文章指出电影“直白而露骨”“毫无忌讳”地讨论枪支管理、核武器控制、美国暴力执政、全球主义等热点问题，还抨击了资本家单纯追求利益罕有回报社会的丑恶，执政过度的tyranny，转基因研究不足之下的盲目推广，我觉得更是对自由的具体社会思考。近期我也看了一部豆瓣评分极低的电影叫做《验收测试》，一部对于思考枪支管理的电影。可能因为在国内个人不能合法拥有枪支有关，所以难以成为大众讨论的热点。但是从近期层出不穷的暴力事件的网络舆论来看，似乎呼吁效仿美国的个人枪支拥有合法化的讨论正在兴起。个人合法拥有枪支好吗？一味禁止个人拥有枪支好吗？全球主义好吗？通过什么手段达成？不怕被暴政者所利用形成新的暴政吗？（电影里贪婪自私的资本家说“地球最多只能容纳5亿人，我们愿意杀死70亿人，大多数人不值得活着，大量的非洲人、印度人和拆哪人过着贫穷的生活，他们不如死了的好。没了他们，世界将更加美好，甚至先从美国开始……”）制作人给出的答案既黑暗又带有光明，人们终将站起来反抗。有如文章指出，制片人将在下一部作品中提出对于EMP攻击之后的想象，如果全球恐怖袭击了，人们将何去何从。
        电影有着深刻的思考，我的能力有限无法完全解读，至少我觉得凭内容而言，这部电影不应该只有3.7这么低分。倘若只考虑他的商业利益，是的，五毛特效，故事情节发展单一枯燥（演员还是很卖力的点个赞）。或许身为市井屁民的我们来说，思考这些问题犹如杞人忧天，狗拿耗子，但作为一个人来说，想要在一个社会立足，必须要对自由有深刻的思考，才能在某个时刻明白自己该站什么队。