这是黑美国的后果,从技术上否定。
下面是网址和内容:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-oct-06-ca-32001-story.html
Missteps for ‘Dancer in the Dark’
Lars von Trier’s “Dancer in the Dark,” that most morose of musicals, is so exasperating in its contradictions, so frustrating in its fakery, so deeply irritating in its pretensions, it’s frankly hard to know where to begin to dissect it.
This is truly a through-the-looking-glass movie, where pervasive inauthenticity is meant to be taken as a mark of transcendent genuineness, where every shameless contrivance, every cynical manipulation, every frame of carefully calculated clumsiness--awkward writing, bungled acting, intentionally ugly cinematography, co-star Catherine Deneuve dressed in the kind of threadbare shmates my old aunts used to wear--is intended as further proof of an honesty and profundity that is supposed to make us grateful instead of aggravated beyond measure.
If further complications are needed, ponder the following: This movie, which worships preposterousness and considers the false to be true, nevertheless contains a remarkable performance by Icelandic pop diva Bjork. Playing a factory worker with more woes than Job, she is, against all reason and expectation, honest and genuine. Go figure that one out.
Easier to figure is where “Dancer’s” artistic point of view comes from. Like the keep-it-real philosophy of Denmark’s Dogma 95 group, of which Von Trier is a founding member, it stems from an almost visceral disgust at the visual slickness, the callow professionalism, the glossy craft skill of the kind of Hollywood cinema that is relentlessly taking over the world. Although not technically a Dogma film, “Dancer’s” delight in the crude and the ugly for their own sake clearly has its roots there.
But, again paradoxically, “Dancer” may be abandoning Hollywood techniques but not the venerable, so-old-they’re-new dramatic forms that have been studio staples for forever. Not only is “Dancer” a musical, it is entirely composed of the rankest, most blatant melodramatic elements, plot contrivances so excessive they make the unsubtle output of producer Jerry Bruckheimer look like the work of austere French director Robert Bresson. In fact, based on this film’s reception, Bruckheimer may be justified in feeling that the only thing that separates his pictures from a Palme d’Or at Cannes and the prestigious opening-night slot at the New York Film Festival is grainy cinematography, a tragic ending and a von in the middle of his name.
In terms of story line, “Dancer’s” tale of a poor little match girl of a Czech immigrant who suffers, suffers, suffers (oh, how she suffers) in rural Washington in 1964 has links to his earlier “Breaking the Waves.” Both are stories of saintly women, too good, too pure, too innocent for this sinful world, women who are abused, tortured and finally destroyed by men. Why do you make films, a female journalist asked the director at Cannes, that could have the collective title of “Breaking the Wives.” Von Trier said he didn’t know.
The simple-minded sufferer this time around is Selma Jezkova (Bjork), an industrious young mother who works a machine at the John Anderson Tool Co. Everyone in town, including her considerate neighbors Bill, the town policeman (David Morse), and his wife, Linda (Cara Seymour), knows Selma’s sight is bad, but no one knows that she’s in the grip of a dread but nameless disease that’s going to blind her in a New York minute. This dread but nameless disease (DBND for short) is also hereditary, but Selma is determined it’s not going to ruin the sight of her 10-year-old son, Gene. It turns out, by the merest chance, that not only is there an operation that can cure the DBND, but it’s regularly performed at a hospital close to Selma’s humble trailer home.
The worse Selma’s eyes get (and yes, they do get worse), the harder she works, taking on a second shift at the plant, ignoring Jeff (Peter Stormare), the hapless geek who is in love with her, even taking on the piece-work job of arranging bobby pins on strips of cardboard. Every penny--it comes to a heart-tugging total of $2,056.10 at last count--must be saved for Gene’s operation. That’s close to enough, but anyone who thinks our young heroine is going to achieve her goals without the most painful, agonizing and bogus experiences Von Trier can imagine hasn’t been paying attention.
The only diversion Selma allows herself are musicals. She watches them with best friend Kathy (Deneuve), shows up at rehearsals for the most pathetic amateur production of “The Sound of Music” in American theatrical history, and even uses her imagination to turn her factory daydreams and reveries into musical production numbers.
Though they may appear unusual to domestic audiences, songs and dances set amid machines were, as detailed in the wonderful documentary “East Side Story,” a staple of musicals made behind the Iron Curtain. What’s different here is the deadly lugubriousness of the dancing, the thudding nature of routines that are notable only for their glumness and zombie-like lack of joy.
Cut from the same cloth is the listlessness of most of the acting, a state encouraged by Von Trier, who has never been to this country and clearly couldn’t care less if the line readings sound recognizably American or not. Just to make sure everyone gets his message, the director operated the camera himself (veteran Robby Muller was the cinematographer) and imposed a jittery, intrusive visual style that pushes the image right in the viewer’s face, the better to milk the already overdone emotions.
The only actor to survive 2 hours and 20 minutes of this tedium is Bjork. Called on to carry a misery-laden picture without any acting training to fall back on, Bjork, by all reports, had to more or less live Selma’s tortured life to get it on film. “Bjork was not acting anything, she was feeling everything,” is how Von Trier explained the process in Cannes, “and that made it extremely hard on herself and everyone else.”
In her case, at least, this process was worthwhile, as the intensity with which Bjork threw herself into the role and the degree to which she believed in her preposterous character lend an undeniable integrity and authenticity to Selma and made Bjork’s best actress prize at Cannes more universally popular than the film’s Palme d’Or. With her whimsical half smile, indescribable accent and overall impish quality, Bjork’s Selma has something wonderfully alive and genuine about her that even the waves of surrounding dross can’t completely tarnish.
“In a musical, nothing dreadful ever happens,” says Selma during a break between the tortures of the damned. “When I worked in the factory, I used to dream of being in a musical.” After all she’s been through, who has the heart to tell her she couldn’t possibly stand the one’s she’s in.
* MPAA rating: R, for some violence. Times guidelines: an extremely graphic public hanging and a particularly brutal murder.
‘Dancer in the Dark’
Bjork: Selma
Catherine Deneuve: Kathy
Peter Stormare: Jeff
David Morse: Bill
Jean-Marc Barr: Norman
Joel Grey: Oldrich Novy
Released by Fine Line Features. Director Lars von Trier. Producer Vibeke Windelov. Screenplay Lars von Trier. Cinematographer Robby Muller. Editor Anders Refn. Costumes Manon Rasmussen. Music Bjork. Production design Karl Juliusson. Choreographer Vincent Paterson. Running time: 2 hours, 20 minutes.
In limited release.
译文(机器翻译):
《黑暗中的舞者》的错误
《黑暗中的舞者》是导演拉斯·冯·提尔的一部充满忧郁色彩的音乐剧,它矛盾重重、令人沮丧且极度令人不适,以至于很难找到剖析其问题的切入点。这是一部镜像反转的电影,其中无处不在的不真实被当作超凡脱俗的真实,每一个刻意为之的剧情设计、每一种愤世嫉俗的情感操纵、每一帧精心策划的拙劣画面——包括尴尬的剧本写作、蹩脚的表演、刻意拍摄的丑陋画面以及主演凯瑟琳·德纳芙穿着犹如我那些老阿姨们所穿的破旧衣物——都被意图作为展现其真诚和深刻性的进一步证据,使观众感到感激而非无法忍受的愤怒。
更复杂的是,这部崇尚荒谬并将虚假视为真实的电影中,却包含了冰岛流行天后比约克的出色表演。饰演一名身患多种不幸的工厂女工,她以不合逻辑且出人意料的方式展现出诚实与真挚。这一点让人难以理解。
影片的艺术视角相对容易理解:如同冯·提尔身为丹麦Dogma 95运动创始成员所秉持的“保持真实”理念一样,该片源于对好莱坞电影视觉上的光鲜亮丽、浅薄的专业性以及华丽工艺技巧近乎本能的反感。虽然《黑暗中的舞者》在技术上并非Dogma电影,但其对于粗犷与丑陋本身的热爱显然源自于Dogma运动的影响。
然而,悖论再次出现,《黑暗中的舞者》虽摒弃了好莱坞的技术手法,却并未放弃那些历史悠久、久而弥新的戏剧形式,这些形式一直是好莱坞工作室长久以来的主流。这部电影不仅是一部音乐剧,而且完全由最粗糙、最露骨的煽情元素构成,其剧情设定如此夸张,甚至让制作人杰瑞·布鲁克海默出品的直白作品相比之下显得像是法国导演罗伯特·布列松的作品。事实上,基于该片的反响,布鲁克海默认为,如果他的电影能够拥有颗粒状的摄影、悲剧结局以及名字中间带“von”的导演,也许就能获得戛纳电影节金棕榈奖和纽约电影节开幕影片这样的殊荣。
从故事情节来看,《黑暗中的舞者》讲述了捷克移民赛尔玛·杰兹科娃(比约克饰)在美国乡村1964年的生活,她的遭遇与冯·提尔早期的《破浪而出》有着相似之处,都是关于圣洁女性的故事——她们过于善良、纯洁、无辜,不适合这个罪恶的世界,受到男性的虐待、折磨,最终走向毁灭。一位女性记者曾在戛纳电影节上问导演为何会拍出可以统称为“打破妻子”的系列电影,冯·提尔表示他并不清楚。
这次故事中的单纯受苦者赛尔玛是一位勤奋的母亲,在约翰·安德森工具公司操作机器。镇上所有人都知道她视力不好,但他们不知道她正遭受一种可怕却又未明说的疾病,很快就会失明。这种疾病还是遗传性的,但赛尔玛决心不让它影响到自己10岁儿子吉恩的视力。巧合的是,恰好有一种手术可以治愈这种疾病,并且就在赛尔玛简陋拖车房附近的医院进行。
随着赛尔玛视力恶化(的确越来越糟),她更加努力工作,开始上两班倒,忽视对她痴心一片的失败者杰夫(彼得·斯特劳迈饰),甚至接手排列发卡在纸板上的计件工作。每一枚硬币——最后统计总额达2056.10美元——都必须为了给吉恩做手术而存起来。这个数目接近足够,但如果认为这位年轻女主角能在冯·提尔想象出的最为痛苦、煎熬和虚假的经历之外实现目标,那无疑是没看懂电影。
赛尔玛唯一的慰藉就是音乐剧。她和最好的朋友凯西(凯瑟琳·德纳芙饰)一起观看音乐剧,参加可能是美国历史上最悲惨业余版《音乐之声》的排练,甚至利用想象力将工厂里的梦境和幻想转变成音乐剧的舞蹈场面。
尽管对于国内观众而言,机器间的歌舞可能显得不同寻常,但在铁幕背后的东欧国家,正如精彩纪录片《东区故事》所述,这是音乐剧中的常见元素。此处的不同在于,这些舞蹈的极度沉闷、击打式的节奏特点,以及毫无欢快感、如僵尸般缺乏活力的表演风格。
演员们的表演也同样沉闷无力,这种状态得到了冯·提尔的鼓励,因为他从未踏足过美国,显然也根本不在乎这些台词听起来是否具有典型的美国特色。为了确保每个人都能接收到他的信息,导演亲自操作摄像机(资深摄影师罗比·穆勒担任摄影指导),并采用了颤抖、侵入式的视觉风格,将影像直接推至观众面前,以便更好地挖掘那些已经被过分渲染的情绪。
在这漫长的两个小时二十分钟的单调乏味中,唯一能幸免于难的演员便是比约克。没有任何表演训练背景的她在承担着这部充满苦难的影片的同时,据报道,比约克几乎要亲身经历赛尔玛所有备受折磨的生活。“比约克并没有演任何东西,她在感受一切,”冯·提尔在戛纳解释这一过程时说道,“这让她自己和其他人都极其艰难。”
至少在比约克身上,这一过程是值得的,因为她全身心投入到角色中的强度以及对比约克来说荒谬无比的角色的坚信,赋予了赛尔玛无可否认的完整性和真实性,并使得她在戛纳电影节上获得最佳女主角奖项获得了比影片本身获得金棕榈奖更为普遍的好评。比约克凭借她那略带俏皮的笑容、无法形容的口音以及整体的精灵般的气质,塑造了一个极具生命力和真实感的赛尔玛形象,即使周围的诸多败笔也无法完全抹杀她的光芒。
“在音乐剧中,没有什么糟糕的事情会发生,”赛尔玛在一次短暂的休息时间里,在承受了一连串地狱般的折磨之后说到,“当我在工厂工作时,我常常梦想着能在音乐剧中演出。”在经历了这一切之后,谁能忍心告诉她,她所置身的音乐剧其实远非她所能承受。
MPAA评级:R级,部分暴力场景。《洛杉矶时报》指南:公开绞刑的极度血腥画面以及一场特别残忍的谋杀。
《黑暗中的舞者》
比约克 饰 赛尔玛
凯瑟琳·德纳芙 饰 凯西
彼得·斯特劳迈 饰 杰夫
大卫·摩斯 饰 比尔
尚-马克·巴尔 饰 诺曼
乔尔·格雷 饰 奥德里奇·诺维
发行商:Fine Line Features。导演:拉斯·冯·提尔。制片人:薇比克·温德尔沃。编剧:拉斯·冯·提尔。摄影指导:罗比·穆勒。剪辑师:安德斯·雷夫尼。服装设计:马农·拉斯穆森。音乐:比约克。艺术指导:卡尔·朱利叶斯森。编舞:文森特·帕特森。片长:2小时20分钟。
有限上映
> 我来回应